Who run F:ATtie-town?

Mad Dog wrote:

I don't need anyone babysitting me so I'll just ban myself right now. Goodbye.

Who is passing around the card and collection plate?

Not me, I'm busy weeping inconsolably.

You fuckers wish it was that easy to get rid of me.

This is what intrigues me so much about F:AT. I can never tell when people are actually pissed off. It's the only forum I know where "asshole" (or worse) is both a term of endearment and an insult.

SusanR wrote:

This is what intrigues me so much about F:AT. I can never tell when people are actually pissed off. It's the only forum I know where "asshole" (or worse) is both a term of endearment and an insult.

I don't think it qualifies for an insult.

SusanR wrote:

This is what intrigues me so much about F:AT. I can never tell when people are actually pissed off.

I'm as pissed off as I can be about what someone else does with their own website. I don't really like nanny-moderators at all, but I also wouldn't argue with anyone enough to be affected by these "go to your room until you can behave" rules.

Mad Dog wrote:

SusanR wrote:

This is what intrigues me so much about F:AT. I can never tell when people are actually pissed off.

I'm as pissed off as I can be about what someone else does with their own website. I don't really like nanny-moderators at all, but I also wouldn't argue with anyone enough to be affected by these "go to your room until you can behave" rules.

I was just thinking, "No need for Mad Dog to get pissed, he never acts like a wanker to anybody."



And I think what Frank meant was that if the eventual loser in the Thunderdome couldn't hack the results and kept wanking, Frank would have to silence them for a bit. If you know Frank, you'll know his tolerance is pretty freaking high. So nobody has anything to worry about.


Unless you're being an asshole.



Being a harlot, on the other hand, is *perfectly* acceptable.

Ken B. wrote:

Being a harlot, on the other hand, is *perfectly* acceptable.

Not as acceptable as a Cheap Harlot, and then we have the legendary Easy Harlot ...

Ken B. wrote:

Being a harlot, on the other hand, is *perfectly* acceptable.

In fact, its encouraged, unless your name is Steve Avery.

SusanR wrote:

This is what intrigues me so much about F:AT. I can never tell when people are actually pissed off.

My observation is "very seldom". But if you're not of the right mindset, just about every comment will come off as rude or insulting.

You could argue that it's become harder to tell since our smilies got confiscated, but then even they were used as a Weapon of Mass Confusion by JMcL63.

Hey Susan - there's a loophole here, so make the most of causing shit until it's fixed !

The Thunderdome
Two Men Enter, 1 Man Leaves...

Someone's keen to get SusanR in a room with him...

Notahandle wrote:

Someone's keen to get SusanR in a room with him...

She's a one-man harlot ... tank-tops and eurogamer talk has got her smitten.

Notahandle wrote:

Someone's keen to get SusanR in a room with him...

Not just any room, the THUNDERDOME!!!!

If this thread isn't an argument for the return of smilies, I don't know what is

SusanR wrote:

Not just any room, the THUNDERDOME!!!!

If this thread isn't an argument for the return of smilies, I don't know what is

Smilies and Thunderdome? One of these things is not like the other, one of these things just doesn't belong...